During an IRB meeting, how should a member with a potential conflict of interest proceed?

A member of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) who has a potential conflict of interest should take specific steps to maintain the integrity of the review process. By disclosing their potential conflict of interest and participating in discussions to answer questions while recusing themselves from voting, the member ensures transparency without compromising the decision-making process. This approach allows the IRB to benefit from the member's expertise about the study, which can be crucial for assessing the ethical implications and safety of the research.

Recusal from voting is essential because it prevents any bias that might arise from the potential conflict. This practice aligns with ethical guidelines, promoting the responsible conduct of research while safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects involved in the study. This balance of participation in discourse, coupled with the decision to abstain from the final vote, upholds the ethical standards necessary for IRB operations.