Which statement correctly describes the ethical principle regarding induced coercion in research consent?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the CITI Human Subjects Research Certification Test. Study with engaging flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ensure you're ready to succeed on your exam!

The statement that indicates inducements are acceptable if they do not influence decision-making processes is accurate because the ethical principle surrounding research consent acknowledges that certain inducements can be appropriate, provided they do not compromise the voluntariness of participants' consent.

Informed consent must be based on a participant's understanding and voluntary agreement to take part in research. While inducements such as financial incentives can be used to encourage participation, they should be structured in a way that does not override or distort the participant's ability to make an informed and voluntary decision. If an inducement is attractive enough to cause potential participants to agree to take part without fully considering the risks or without genuine interest, it could be seen as coercive. Therefore, the ethical framework allows for inducements, but careful consideration must ensure that they do not improperly influence participants' choices.

Considering the context of other options, the first statement that all inducements undermine voluntary consent is a blanket assertion that overlooks instances where they can be ethically justified if managed properly. The third option, claiming that financial incentives never represent undue influence, is overly simplistic since the impact of incentives can vary based on context and the participant's circumstances. Lastly, the assertion about the ease of identifying inducements by research boards fails to acknowledge

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy